That found on tape decks) is used to detect 1000 pulse signals which have been precisely. Provement of the performance of DENON DP Series turntables can be accomplished. Turntable platter consists of two structures: upper platter. Denon DP-6000. Servo Controlled. Denon established its original motor control system using magnetic recording method for speed and phase. Platter: 1.8kg diecast. Excellent point. I would think, that if I were deigning a TT. I would want to use a some sort of magnetic drive, where there is no physical connection between the sub platter and the motor. I would think that a belt would provide additional isolation between the vibration of the motor and the sub platter. ![]() Still I could see where it would still couple the motor to the sub platter. But, as you propose your question, I am wondering if the running belt, doesn't introduce vibration of its own? These are things that I wounder about myself. Before the past 5-years, the last time I had anything to do with a TT, was back in 1982. Back then, Thoren's was considered to be the top home TT. It was was found in the higher end audio stores. I never ever owned one of those, but I did have a few friends who did. I have a Dual 1219 TT. This is because I like to place a record on the platter and move the lever to the start position. I have never been in a room with a Lynn, let alone all this new NASA stuff y'all are using, with NASA price tags too! Click to expand.I never knew that! My Technics was so long ago, but it seemed to me that the motor ran the shaft directly. Has it always been this way? ![]() Or is this something new? I never remember reading in the literature back in the day, that they were magnetically driven. That being the case, I would prefer a design of that nature, well implemented, to having a belt. I liked my old Technics TT, was just bothered by vibration issues, not from the motor, but I figured the connection from the motor was transferring vibrations that the plith and moter were receiving to the platter. Thank You for educating me on this! Codlplay the scientist mp3. Score another point for the members of SHF's, yea! Click to expand.Yes, that's true. I do think it's interesting that it seems the Japanese market generally still considered that DDs were the best and held onto right up until the end of that era. Here's an example from a British hi-fi magazine review circa 1980 of the Technics SL-1700MK2 which uses the same drive system as a slew of other Technics including the 1200MK2: 'No further comment was necessary on the motor performance save to say that the excellent results reflect the limits of the test rather than those of the motor! The rumble spectrogram was dominated by static electrical components, the only significant motor noise being that at 200Hz lying some 88dB below the reference level!' That level of performance was typical of the good DD motors from that era. The review praised a lot about the 1700MK2, like the low tonearm bearing friction, but it was obvious where Technics skimped a bit was on the plinth. But that wasn't always the case with Technics and many other DD manufacturers used nice plinths too. It should be noted that the mythical direct-drive 'cogging' didn't show up in the review's wow and flutter measurements. Wow and flutter levels were practically non-existent and considered inaudible by the reviewer. By its nature, even if it existed, 'cogging' would show up as flutter. IMO, infinitesimal amounts of flutter are irrelevant regardless of how they're being generated. Yes, that's true. I do think it's interesting that it seems the Japanese market generally still considered that DDs were the best and held onto right up until the end of that era. [149.3 MB] This software equipped with crack for activator. With DevComponents DotNetBar 14.1.0.23 you can design your user interface easily and in the shortest time possible. Download Cracked version of DotNetBar 12.1.0.0 + Crack, دانلود نسخه کرک شده DotNetBar 12.1.0.0 + Crack. Download DevComponents DotNetBar 14.1.0.18 Full Crack. DevComponents DotNetBar 14.1.0.18 Full Crack. Download Links – 122.1. TSR Watermark Image Pro 3.5.9.5. Ableton 9.5 crack download. Download Full Version DevComponents DotNetBar 14.1.0.18 For Free, DevComponents DotNetBar 14 Crack. Here's an example from a British hi-fi magazine review circa 1980 of the Technics SL-1700MK2 which uses the same drive system as a slew of other Technics including the 1200MK2: 'No further comment was necessary on the motor performance save to say that the excellent results reflect the limits of the test rather than those of the motor! The rumble spectrogram was dominated by static electrical components, the only significant motor noise being that at 200Hz lying some 88dB below the reference level!' That level of performance was typical of the good DD motors from that era. The review praised a lot about the 1700MK2, like the low tonearm bearing friction, but it was obvious where Technics skimped a bit was on the plinth. But that wasn't always the case with Technics and many other DD manufacturers used nice plinths too. It should be noted that the mythical direct-drive 'cogging' didn't show up in the review's wow and flutter measurements. Wow and flutter levels were practically non-existent and considered 'inaudible' by the reviewer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |